When do I use 是…的 vs 的?

Use 是…的 to emphasize the time, place, manner, or agent of a past action. Use 的 as an attributive or possessive marker before a noun. They are not interchangeable; 是…的 contains its own 的 that closes the clause, whereas standalone 的 attaches modifiers to nouns.

Can 是 be left out in 是…的?

Yes, in informal spoken Chinese, 是 is often omitted, especially when the emphasis is clear from context. For example, '我昨天来的' instead of '我是昨天来的'. However, the 的 must remain; omitting it changes the construction.

Is 是…的 used for future or habitual actions?

No, 是…的 is specifically used for past completed actions. For future or habitual actions, use other structures like 会…的 or 是要…的 for emphasis.

How do I negate a 是…的 sentence?

Place 不 before 是: 不是在…的. For example, '我不是昨天来的' (I did not come yesterday). The 的 stays at the end.

Easily confusedHSK 4

是…的 vs 的: emphasis structure vs attributive particle

是…的 is a cleft structure used to emphasize the time, place, or manner of a past action, while 的 is a grammatical particle that marks attribution (possession, modification). The core difference is that 是…的 focuses on a specific detail of a completed event, and 的 simply connects a modifier to a noun.

是…的 is a fixed grammatical structure that highlights the time, place, manner, or agent of a past event (e.g., 我是昨天来的 'I came yesterday'). It always involves a verb and is used for emphasis in statements about completed actions. On the other hand, 的 is a versatile particle that marks modification: it attaches to adjectives, nouns, or verbs to form attributive phrases that describe a noun (e.g., 红色的花 'red flower'), and it also indicates possession (e.g., 我的书 'my book'). The two are not interchangeable: 是…的 contains a separate 是 and 的 that frame the verb phrase, whereas standalone 的 appears before a noun or as a possessive marker.

使い分け

是…的shì… de

emphatic structure

Use 是…的 to emphasize a specific detail (time, place, manner, or person) about a past action, especially in statements that confirm or correct information. The structure surrounds the verb phrase: 是 + [emphasized element] + verb + 的. It is common in answers to questions that ask for details, and it implies the action is already known.

The 的 in this structure is not an attributive marker; it functions as a particle that closes the clause. 是 can be omitted in informal speech, but the 的 remains essential.

的de

attributive particle

Use 的 to link a modifier to a noun—possessive (我的 'my'), descriptive (漂亮的花 'beautiful flower'), or relational (昨天的新闻 'yesterday's news'). It is placed after the modifier (adjective, noun, pronoun, verb phrase) and before the noun. It can also be used as a nominalizer (e.g., 红的 'the red one').

When 的 appears after a verb (as in 是…的), it is part of a grammatical construction and does not modify a noun. In other contexts, 的 can also indicate a past action when used with 是, but standalone 的 never expresses emphasis.

ひと目で分かる

	是…的	的
Grammatical function	Cleft structure highlighting a detail of a past event	Attributive or possessive marker connecting modifier to noun
Presence of 是	Requires 是 (or implied) before the emphasized element	No '是' involved; directly attaches to modifier
Temporal reference	Always refers to a completed past action	No inherent time reference; works with any tense via context
Position in sentence	Frames the verb phrase: 是 + X + verb + 的	Appears after the modifier and before a noun (or at end if nominalized)
Negation	Not negated with 不; use 不是…的	Negated by placing 不 before the modifier (e.g., 不漂亮的花) or by using 没有 for possessive (e.g., 没有我的)

例文

是…的
我是昨天来的。
Wǒ shì zuó tiān lái de.
I came yesterday. (emphasis on 'yesterday')
是…的 emphasizes the time of the past action.
是…的
你是在哪儿学的汉语？
Nǐ shì zài nǎ r xué de hàn yǔ?
Where did you learn Chinese? (emphasis on place)
Questions use 是…的 to ask for a specific detail.
是…的
他坐火车去的上海。
Tā zuò huǒ chē qù de shàng hǎi.
He went to Shanghai by train. (emphasis on manner)
是 can be omitted in informal speech.
的
我的书是红色的。
Wǒ de shū shì hóng sè de.
My book is red.
First 的 = possessive; second 的 = classifier '的' after 是 (but note: this is not 是…的 structure; here '红色的' is a nominalized adjective, and '是…的' is a simple copula, not emphasis).
的
那是一个漂亮的花园。
Nà shì yí gè piào liang de huā yuán.
That is a beautiful garden.
Attributive 的: adjective '漂亮' modifies '花园'.
的
昨天买的那本书很有意思。
Zuó tiān mǎi de nà běn shū hěn yǒu yì si.
That book bought yesterday is very interesting.
Verb phrase '昨天买的' modifies '那本书'.

よくある間違い

Using 的 alone to emphasize a detail of a past action: e.g., '我昨天来的’ without 是 can be understood as a reduced form of 是…的, but in writing or formal speech it may sound unnatural. Use full 是…的 for clarity.
Placing 是…的 frame on a present or future action: e.g., '我是明天去的' is incorrect; 是…的 only refers to past events.
Confusing the 的 in 是…的 with an attributive 的: e.g., '我是昨天到的人' (I am the person who arrived yesterday) uses 的 as attributive, which is a different structure—learners might think it's emphasis.
Omitting 是 in questions: '你什么时候来的？' is correct as a reduced form, but learners might omit both 是 and 的, saying '你什么时候来？' which changes the meaning to present/future.

よくある質問

When do I use 是…的 vs 的?: Use 是…的 to emphasize the time, place, manner, or agent of a past action. Use 的 as an attributive or possessive marker before a noun. They are not interchangeable; 是…的 contains its own 的 that closes the clause, whereas standalone 的 attaches modifiers to nouns.
Can 是 be left out in 是…的?: Yes, in informal spoken Chinese, 是 is often omitted, especially when the emphasis is clear from context. For example, '我昨天来的' instead of '我是昨天来的'. However, the 的 must remain; omitting it changes the construction.
Is 是…的 used for future or habitual actions?: No, 是…的 is specifically used for past completed actions. For future or habitual actions, use other structures like 会…的 or 是要…的 for emphasis.
How do I negate a 是…的 sentence?: Place 不 before 是: 不是在…的. For example, '我不是昨天来的' (I did not come yesterday). The 的 stays at the end.